Who reads this blog will have noticed a growing number of Italian government has decided or is considering the use of free software on their PCs.
In fact, the motivation is no doubt that the incentive of saving money, but a careful administration will not miss the ethical implications of that choice.
Globally we are witnessing attempts at establishment of "information ecosystems" national issue.
The main characters are actors in the absolute forefront of the economic scene and information such as China, North Korea and Russia.
The reasons for this choice are mainly the reduction of dependence on foreign companies and national prestige (sometimes a bit 'forced and pushed to the extreme hazard).
course, free software is the master being used in abundance.
And when Microsoft's reactions become more numerous and vibrant, then we realize that our work is going in the right direction.
After the video posted to discredit OpenOffice arguing bordering on the ridiculous, here's the interview with Nikolai Pryanishnikov , chairman of Microsoft Russia, which appeared on the issue Russian CNet.
The original source is the blog open ... from which to learn the news.
Microsoft supports technological neutrality, and believes that sc elta an operating system must be made solely on the criteria of distribution, cost, convenience, safety, rather than by ideological considerations.
our point of view, the most effective way to develop an innovative economy in the state is not to create an operating system similar to an existing one, which will require large amounts of time and money, from the most popular operating systems, tested by the Russian security services, to create applications and solutions, but these resources to invest in promising scientific developments that are genuinely Russian. We must bear in mind that Linux is an operating system not Russian, and, moreover, is at the end of its useful life.
analyzing the extract of an interview, you realize how Microsoft should embrace the principles of free software, claiming for herself without shame, convinced that the common user giving him act.
How can we not agree on the first sentence stated?
Everyone should have the right to use the operating system they prefer in their technological neutrality that Microsoft has destroyed and made it particularly difficult.
When you buy a PC, there is not much choice: the operating system is preinstalled.
criteria of economy, convenience and security do not belong to the Windows operating system, for which, turns out to be expensive, difficult (each version is different from the previous year and almost never compatible) and very unsafe, so much so that there is often a pre-installed antivirus whose license is purchased after a trial period.
The second sentence leaves a bad taste in my mouth because, although it is true that a good business leader must believe in their products (and their company), it is equally true that hide the reality can not do anything but cause deep damage.
Linux is nothing but the basis for creating personal distribution, highly secure and efficient.
then honestly, I think even Windows operating system is a Russian.
that someone would deny this! Please!
Now I wonder: is Linux or Windows to be close to its life cycle?
If we think about it, Windows owes its fortune almost entirely to economic agreements obsolete closely with manufacturers of hardware.
0 comments:
Post a Comment