Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Mount Snap Server On Ubuntu

change. Fraud at the restaurant. Decline in credibility on the history of the internet yet

Unlike the rules of God that can be violated (at least in our model Catholic creed) the rules of the game between men do not. In other words if you scrub to a portfolio is very difficult for you to forgive her in one way or another. The less the next time take my hand, meeting, the place had.

With a bold leap to the Internet go consumption. In simple terms the adoption of the instrument for purposes of commerce as well as changing its features it has basically laid down the pecking order.
Even here in very simple terms that can be groped to paraphrase the behavior of people (who are the ones who pay the internet and they remember it) this way: "My dear sellers, we broke the balls and how to buy when you want it. We want to buy or when we feel we need and want to say what we think of us. "On this covenant to be subscribed, tacitly or otherwise, is required by the user are born to enjoy e-bay and paypal. In the book the equivalent distribution of the product "I want to buy the book for which I am not a fancy one in the counter of the book" Amazon has been successful and with it the concept of "long tail".

The futility of the site brochure quite clear in the late nineties. The brochure (and its website) was the form of presentation, usually seasoned with hyperbole from Carousel, one or more products or a company or institution. The hyperbole was in an exaggerated form part accepted as a convention media (to date the majority of Italians who voted to accept). Here too, the Internet user could be transferred made more or less like this: "I want to decide the product version that offered me why the hell do you insist on telling me that I just have to buy and believe."

The error of the restaurant in Rome was just that. Did not understand that has changed the idea of \u200b\u200bpositive experience. This not to hide behind the usual finger. After all, the Convention has it that the restaurant still make you pay higher prices to market anything. Not only that but our restorative work in the city where the republic's rule P3 (Pope, Popes and jelly). And you want to be in such a case 613 Euro? And here's the problem. Probably if he had put in our restaurant guide (reserved for Japanese) also explains the "popular from P3 Romana "with the entry in wikipedia to explain cheddar P3 is not happened. In fact maybe this couple, happily, he would find an incentive lunch in a place frequented by such figures. This is to remember that this is not a moralistic discourse (to other consumption) coscenziosità on most end-user (he he always the way) but simply that you are with new models of communication have to use other forms of agreement otherwise, a conflict arises and a loss of credibility.

And back to the usual problem of credibility. According to the modern neuroscientist we humans have developed a part of the brain dedicated to the intentions of inteprezione our fellows. The area (areas) are identified by the acronym TOM: Theory of Mind. In essence, we borrowed an evolutionary specialization in the interpretation of the thoughts of our peers. These evolutionary adaptations have probably developed along the Pleistocene. It may have traces continuously in all our attempts to anticipate the next. The part of the brain dedicated to all (according to surveys) is important. An interesting result related to credibility is well defined in this short article that applies on the economic crisis and its implicit meaning.

seems that we raised in our culture mainland, at least in the tourism sector, a decline sensitive to credibility. Unfortunately, the lack of a practice to communicate with current forms of disadvantage us a lot of respect for those who have not played this credibility. But there's always the option of jumping rabbits (Schumpeterian of memory) and understand the implications of technology, perhaps not considering a simple amenicolo without consequences then, for the sale of the fish to Pescasseroli. The error is in having to always do a turn of phrase instead of going to the point of it at that. From there on it will be easier to understand if the agreement "is an innkeeper, and then shot to scrub" or "is a politician and then steal the sweets to the children when I bend to kiss" is or is not well accepted, and take steps accordingly. I'm not a Cendo again not to tell balls that go straight to the point, but such feedback produces better manageable and usually increases its credibility.

course for people who spend their time balls can be hard to tell not to mention that it is not even a practice round of downloadable sull'immancabile precarious. and as I said at the beginning nor is there any transfer of saving confession.


Blogged with the Flock Browser

0 comments:

Post a Comment